Volume 1, Issue 2, June 2018, Page: 84-91
Decision Making Styles among Professor in Central University of Bihar - an Empirical Study of Predictors
Sushil Kumar, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India
Neeraj Gautam, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India
Received: Oct. 28, 2017;       Accepted: Dec. 13, 2017;       Published: Mar. 8, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180102.15      View  939      Downloads  40
Abstract
Decision making is one of the most important elements in the functioning of an organisation. Every day we face numerous alternatives and have to make a decision about which one to select. A well-crafted decision can help the organisation move in the right direction and affect people across the organisation to a large extent, thus to be effective, one needs to be aware of their decision making styles so that an attempt can be made to evolve and work on inefficient and ineffective styles to make themselves better equipped to make the decisions that are required. From an organisational point of view, since the success or failure can be vastly impacted by decisions made by the employees it is important that they find out the decision making style and then use it for further developmental purposes or even for finding the right person-job fit. Since a university is an organisation and professors form a core group whose decisions impact not only the success of the institution but also the future of our country as a consequence of the bearing their decisions have on the students who are the future leaders of this nation. In the Indian context, with the youth constituting a major part of the population, the impact of professors is extremely high. Research suggests that while people may have different decision making styles but they have a high predisposition towards one particular style and that is explored in this study. The study delved into the impact of personality types on decision making styles and it revealed that there is a direct and positive relationship between conscientiousness and a rational decision making style, between neuroticism and an avoidant decision making style, openness to experience and an intuitive decision making style. A demographic factor, age and its impact on intuitive decision making style was tested which indicated that no such relationship exists. Finally, the impact of self-esteem on an individual’s decision making style suggests that people with high self-esteem have a predisposition towards a rational decision making style and they are unlikely to have an avoidant decision making style.
Keywords
Decision Making Style, Intuitive, Predisposition & Right Person-Job Fit
To cite this article
Sushil Kumar, Neeraj Gautam, Decision Making Styles among Professor in Central University of Bihar - an Empirical Study of Predictors, International Journal of Law and Society. Vol. 1, No. 2, 2018, pp. 84-91. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20180102.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Aikins, Deane E, and Michelle G Craske. “Cognitive theories ofgeneralized anxiety disorder.” The Psychiatric Clinical of North America Vol 24 No 1, 2001 57-71.
[2]
Alexander, Simon H. The New Science of Management Decision. New York: Harper and Row, 1960.
[3]
Anthony, Danu B, Joanne V Wood, and John G Holmes. “Testing sociometer theory: Self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making.” journal of Experimental Social Psychology Vol 43 No 3, 2007: 425-432.
[4]
Barrick, Murray R., and Michael K. Mount. “The Big Five Personality dimensions and job performance: A meta analysis.” Personnel Psychology, 1991: 1-26.
[5]
Baumeister, Roy F, and Mark R Leary. “The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.” Psychological Bulletin Vol 117, 1995: 497-529.
[6]
Baumeister, Roy F, Karen Dale, and Kristin L Sommer. “Freudian Defense Mechanisms and Empirical Findings in Modern Social Psychology: Reaction Formation, Projection, Displacement, Undoing, Isolation, Sublimation, and Denial.” Journal of Personality Vol 66 No 6, 1998: 1081–1124.
[7]
Bednar, Richard L, and Scott R Peterson. Self-esteem: Paradoxes and Innovations in. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1989.
[8]
Bernstein, Basil B. Class, Codes and Control: Towards a Theory of Educational Transmission, Volume 3 as cited in Harthi, Hamood A; Ginsburg, Mark B 'Student-Faculty Power/Knowledge Relations:The implications of the internet in the College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University'. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975.
[9]
Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, and Roger Smeets. “Entrepreneurial Culture and Economic Growth.” american Journal of Economics and Sociology Vol 67 No5, 2008: 915-940.
[10]
Bierman, Dick J, Arnaud Destrebecqz, and Axel Cleeremans. “Intuitive decision making in complex situations: somatic markers in an artificial grammar learning task.” Cognitive, affective and behavioural neuroscience, 2005: 297-305.
[11]
Blustein, David L. “Decision-making styles and vocational maturity: An alternative perspective.” Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol 30, 1987: 61-71.
[12]
Bolger, Niall. “Coping as a personality process: A prospective study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 59, 1990: 525-537.
[13]
Bolger, Niall, and Elizabeth A Schilling. “Personality and the Problems of Everyday Life: The Role of Neuroticism In Exposure and Reactivity to Daily Stressors.” Journal of Personality Vol 59 No 3, 1991: 355-386.
[14]
Bosson, Jennifer K, Ryan P Brown, and Virgil Zeigler-Hill. “Self-Enhancement Tendencies Among People With High Explicit Self-Esteem: The Moderating Role of Implicit Self-Esteem.” Self and Identity Vol 2, 2003: 169–187.
[15]
Branden, Nathaniel. The psychology of self-esteem. A new concept of man’s psychological nature. Los Angeles: Nash, 1969.
[16]
Brown, Jonathan D, and Margaret A Marshall. “The Three Faces of Self-Esteem.” In M. Kernis (Ed.), Self-esteem: Issues and answers New York: Psychology Press, 2001: 4-9.
[17]
Brown, Jonathon D, and Keith & Dutton. “The thrill of victory, the complexity of defeat: self-esteem and people’s emotional.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol 68, 1995: 712-722.
[18]
Burns, Robert B. The Self-concepts in Theory, Measurement, Development and Behaviour. London: Longman, 1979. Butler, Richard. Designing Organizations: A Decision Making Perspective. London: Routledge, 1992.
[19]
Campbell, Jennifer D. “Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept.” Journal of Personality and, 1990: 538-49.
[20]
Cattell, Raymond B. “The description of personality. Principles and findings in a factor analysis.” American Journal of Psychology Vol 58, 1945: 69-90.
[21]
Cervone, Frank H. “Making decisions: Methods for digital library project teams.” OCLC Systems & Services, Vol. 21 No 1, 2005: 30-35.
[22]
Chartrand, Judy. M, Mellisa L Rose, Timmothy R Elliott, Cheri Marmarosh, and Susan Caldwell. “Peeling Back the Onion: Personality, Problem Solving, and Career Decision-Making Style Correlates of Career Indecision.” Journal of Career Assessment Vol 1, 1993: 66-84.
[23]
Costa, Paul T Jr, and Robert R McCrae. “Comparison ofEPI and Psychoticism scales with measures of the five factor model of personality.” Personality and Individual Differences Vol 6, 1985: 587-597.
Browse journals by subject